At TEDxAIMS: “Tech spreads slowly”

Arthur Attwell at TEDxAIMSYesterday’s TEDxAIMS was incredible. AIMS is the African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, an institution that provides full one-year, live-in scholarships to post-grad sciences students from around Africa, and leads the inspiring Next Einstein Initiative. I spoke about my experiences trying to build fancy-tech products in South Africa, and my belief that for as long as we think “technology spreads quickly”, we’ll be working on the wrong problems.

Update 19 Feb 2013: I’ve now added the video. The text of the talk is below.

Continue reading →

M4D’s inconvenient truth

I loved this post by social-enterprise tech guru Ken Banks, articulating many of the principles we now (after years of getting it wrong) try to live by at Electric Book Works and Paperight.

Yes, we should provide local entrepreneurs and grassroots non-profits with tools – and where appropriate and requested, expertise – but we shouldn’t develop solutions to problems we don’t understand, we shouldn’t take ownership of a problem that isn’t ours and we certainly shouldn’t build things thousands of miles away and then jump on a plane in search of a home for them.

Highly recommended reading.

Choosing your first ereader

Ereading by warzauwynn on Flickr (CC-BY-NC)So you’ve decided that that many people can’t be wrong: it’s time to get an ereader. But which one? The industry of ereaders and other mobile devices is filled with big and small companies promising you the world, and you don’t trust half of it.

The cruel truth is that no one can tell you exactly what’s best for you. Everyone’s preferences are different. You simply have to figure it out for yourself, and this might be an expensive journey. That said, if you’re going to take the plunge, here’s my two cents’ worth. It might help you dodge a few bullets along the way. Continue reading →

Technology doesn’t solve problems

"Slide and release the power switch to wake"—Jules VerneWhen you’re a tech-oriented person, people assume you think tech solves problems. Tech doesn’t, it’s just a useful and flexible tool.

At Education Week recently, acclaimed ICT Educator Sarietjie Musgrave explained that, for her: technology + poor teaching = expensive poor teaching. I couldn’t agree more.

I recently revisited a now famous Wired interview with Steve Jobs from early 1996, in which he talks about this, too:

I used to think that technology could help education. I’ve probably spearheaded giving away more computer equipment to schools than anybody else on the planet. But I’ve had to come to the inevitable conclusion that the problem is not one that technology can hope to solve. What’s wrong with education cannot be fixed with technology. No amount of technology will make a dent.
…
Lincoln did not have a Web site at the log cabin where his parents home-schooled him, and he turned out pretty interesting. Historical precedent shows that we can turn out amazing human beings without technology. Precedent also shows that we can turn out very uninteresting human beings with technology.

It’s not as simple as you think when you’re in your 20s – that technology’s going to change the world. In some ways it will, in some ways it won’t.

I’m no Jobs fanatic, but he hits the nail on the head here. More importantly, he goes on to talk about the need for educators and parents to foster creativity as the real engine of progress:

Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a while. That’s because they were able to connect experiences they’ve had and synthesize new things. And the reason they were able to do that was that they’ve had more experiences or they have thought more about their experiences than other people.

Unfortunately, that’s too rare a commodity. A lot of people in our industry haven’t had very diverse experiences. So they don’t have enough dots to connect, and they end up with very linear solutions without a broad perspective on the problem. The broader one’s understanding of the human experience, the better design we will have.

It’s been over sixteen years since Jobs made those observations, which in Internet time makes them important lessons from distant history. We now have all the technological tools Jobs talks about, and yet many of the societal problems, too. That’s why I’ll never argue that technology solves our problems. Technology just helps us to solve them ourselves.

Why I’m pushing paper

After five years running EBW, an ebook consultancy, I’m often asked: why am I investing my time in Paperight, a business focused on printing out books on photocopiers? Surely mobile Internet – and ebooks generally – are making paper reading redundant?

Sure they are, for people with web-capable phones, reliable electricity, and the money for data. Where there really is 3G coverage. Who aren’t trying to learn architecture or mechanical engineering on a 3-inch screen.

It’s possible, even likely, that that will never be everyone. Continue reading →